Categories: Opinion Voices

Shifting Paradigms and Abandonment of Palestine: Part 3, Lebanon and Jordan

By Chase Lacy

By Chase Lacy

Rabat – After Palestine suffered the horrific events of 1948, neighbors Lebanon and Jordan were major recipients of Palestinian refugees. Both pursued radically different policies at the outset that have evolved into their own unfortunate realities.

Lebanon has hosted hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees, and the UN Relief Works Agency (UNRWA) has 450,000 Palestinians registered as refugees there. However, a new census released by the government puts the number at approximately 175,000. Palestinians, however, are poorly treated in the country and subjected to horrendous conditions.

Jordan has the highest population of Palestinian refugees, with over 2 million in the country. Jordanians of Palestinian origins make up nearly half—or more—of the overall population. Citizenship revocations, administrative under-representation, and economic deals contribute to the continued injustices against Palestinians.

Limbo and grim conditions in Lebanon

Palestinians in Lebanon are subjected to terrible conditions by the Lebanese government.

Palestinians are effectively treated as inferior residents. They are banned from working in most job fields and professions, banned from owning property or businesses, banned from formal education systems, and are left with few options but to live in dilapidated camps.

The Lebanese government refuses to give Palestinians citizenship even when they have Lebanese mothers, for fear that they will never leave or that demographic changes could destabilize Lebanon’s fragile political system.

Bassam Khawaja, a spokesperson for Human Rights Watch says, “This is a cruel and false hypothesis. Nothing prevents Lebanon from respecting Palestinians’ basic human rights while withholding permanent residency or citizenship. But instead, generations have grown up in limbo, without basic protections.”

Inside the camps that Palestinians live in, housing, water, electricity, and refuse services are decaying, dangerous, and responsible for gangrenous living conditions. The structures worsen progressively, since Palestinians are prohibited from bringing materials into the camps to repair their homes.

A study released in 2012 called “Health and Living Conditions of Palestinian Refugees Residing in Camps and Gatherings in Lebanon: A Cross-sectional Survey,” sheds light on the effects of the horrific conditions.

The study found, in a random screening of 2,501 households, 31 percent of the 11,092 individuals surveyed had chronic illnesses and 24 percent had had an acute illness in the six months prior to the survey.

Eighty-two percent of the 2,501 household respondents were women; 52 percent reported chronic illness in their household, 28 percent reported an acute illness in their household, and 55 percent were psychologically distressed.  

The study also found that 42 percent of households had water leakage from roofs and walls, and 8 percent of the buildings were constructed with materials that are known to be hazardous to health. The study found a positive correlation between households that had water leakage and inhabitants that reported chronic illnesses.

UNRWA report

A 2016 report by the American University in Beirut and the UNRWA indicates that conditions in Lebanon have worsened for Palestinians. 78 percent of Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon (PRL) reported dampness in their homes and 62 percent report water leakages. Fifty-two percent of homes have poor ventilation and 55.2 percent suffer from a lack of electricity.

For Palestinian Refugees from Syria in Lebanon (PRS), 81.1 percent of households have dampness, 68 percent have water leakages, 54.6 percent have poor ventilation, and 57.6 percent do not have proper electricity.

A majority of PRL and PRS households, 81.3 percent and 83 percent, respectively, reported that at least one family member suffered from chronic illness. Sixty-three percent of PRL and 75 percent of PRS respondents reported at least one family member had suffered from an acute illness in the prior six months. Both groups of Palestinians reported 10 percent who were disabled.

Palestinians rely on cash assistance and medical care from the UNRWA. However, UNRWA is severely underfunded and cannot give adequate monthly stipends to Palestinian families. Neither can they offer a full range of medical services.

Palestinians with severe illnesses such as cancer must appeal to other NGOs for their care.

Jordan’s revocation of nationality

Jordan has pursued policies working against the future hopeful state of Palestine, its people, and Jordanians of Palestinian descent.

A 1954 nationality law granted full Jordanian citizenship to Palestinian residents of the West Bank and Jerusalem in 1949 and after][. However, since 1988, Jordan has been revoking the citizenship of Jordanians of Palestinian origins, rendering them stateless, or downgrading their rights in Jordan. Jordan has increasingly used this practice in recent years.

Since 1983, Jordan has issued color-coded travel cards to Palestinians in the West Bank and those living inside the kingdom, creating a three-tiered citizenship framework. Jordan gave West Bank residents green cards and yellow cards to those living on the East Bank.

Palestinians holding green cards lost their right to live in the East Bank and their Jordanian nationality after 1988. They could maintain Jordanian passports, but held no rights as Jordanians.

Between the years of 2004-2008 alone, Jordan has violated the 1954 law 2,700 times.

The government has revoked yellow cards that entitle full citizenship rights or replaced them with green cards which only entitle the individual to the passport. Yellow card holders must renew their permits for the West Bank from the Israeli Military’s Civil Administration to keep their Jordanian nationality and the right to reside in and return to the West Bank.

Those that were unable to renew Israeli permits, never obtained permits for living in Jordan, failed to obtain an Israeli family reunification permit, or did not have a Palestinian identification document have had their nationality withdrawn.

The government does not officially notify Palestinians when their nationality is revoked, so individuals usually discover it during routine events, such as renewing passports, driving licenses or registering the birth of a child.

Once nationality is stripped, Jordanians of Palestinian origins lose access to free education; must pay higher university, medical, and license renewal fees; and cannot be employed by the state or practice in organized professions such as law. Many private sector employers will also not hire them.

Gazans refused rights

Unlike Palestinian refugees from the West Bank and Jerusalem, Gazans fleeing after the 1967 war were never afforded citizenship status by Jordan since Egypt had administered Gaza previously.

Many are packed into the Jerash camp, locally known as the “Gaza camp,” with little hope to improve their state. They are restricted from employment by the state, organized professions, and many private sector jobs.

Access to higher education is restricted due to higher prices that individuals of foreigner status must pay and the fact the Jerash camp is the most destitute of the Palestinian refugee camps in Jordan.

Gerrymandering and under-representation

Jordan gerrymanders its voting districts in favor of the Hashemite monarchy to sustain the political status quo.

Districts with the highest concentrations of pro-monarchy ethnically Jordanian residents receive a disproportionately high number of representatives in contrast to their actual population.  

Districts with high numbers of Jordanians of Palestinian origins have comparatively fewer representatives. Amman’s second district, which has 9.71 percent of Jordan’s voting population, has only 5.2 percent of the seats. Likewise, Zarqa’s first district, with 10.42 percent of the voters, has only 6.9 percent of the seats.

On the other hand, Bedouin strongholds loyal to the royal family, such as Kerak, have 4.05 percent of the voting population but 8.6 percent of the seats. Ma’an, with 1.43 percent of the voters, also has 8.6 percent of the seats.

Energy Deals with Israel

In 2014, state-owned companies Arab Potash and Jordan Bromine signed a deal worth USD 500 million that would see Israel export from its Tamar natural gas field to Jordan. The deal operates through an American intermediary, NBL: Eastern Mediterranean Marketing.

In 2016 Jordan inked an energy deal with Israel worth USD 10 billion. The deal includes Houston’s Noble Energy and Israel’s Delek Drilling supplying Jordan’s National Electric Power Company with 45 billion cubic meters of natural gas over a 15-year period. The companies also use NBL as an intermediary.

Despite alternatives such as solar or its own oil shale reserves, Jordan chooses to economically link itself to Israel and help fund Israel’s military aggressions and illegal settlements.

Lebanon has denigrated Palestinians to a shocking degree, refusing citizenship, forcing many to live in squalor, stateless, and without hope. Jordan is undergoing processes to rid the country of Palestinians, or at least to undermine their influence at the administrative level. Jordan is subjecting Palestinians to subjugation, and/or they are part of financing the Israeli occupation and human rights violations on Palestinians.

This is the third in a 5-part opinion series evaluating the conduct of MENA region states in upholding their commitments to Palestine. Read the first part about Egypt here, and the second part about the Gulf states here 

Part 4 will investigate the nature of Turkey’s relationship with Israel.