Join on WhatsApp 
Join on Telegram Morocco’s response to the earthquake demonstrates a strategic approach to international aid, prioritizing citizen welfare and national sovereignty. The decision to accept aid based on population needs highlights a commitment to targeted and efficient assistance.
This approach counters potential wastefulness in disaster scenarios and mitigates misinformation propagated by many French media outlets which, since France offered aid, have stirred up controversy by insinuating that Morocco is withholding aid and putting lives at risk. Morocco’s stance rectifies misleading narratives that could hinder relief efforts, keeping the focus on effective disaster response rather than controversy.
It is not the first time that a country has refused or has made priorities on what aid to accept in such circumstances. For example, India refused aid from foreign countries after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, the disaster prompted a global response, with countries around the world offering aid and support.
However, no Moroccan official has talked about refusing or postponing international aid as a comprehensive rescue strategy based on international standards has been launched, including rescue of lives, reconstruction of devastated regions, and compensation for affected citizens.
While Morocco has neither accepted nor rejected the aid offered by France, the President of France, Emmanuel Macron, sought to reiterate his support for the Moroccan people. In doing so, he attempts to dismiss the controversies, stating, “We are at their side, today and tomorrow”.
In terms of diplomatic protocols, particularly in situations akin to Morocco’s current circumstances, it is deemed appropriate for aid propositions to be conducted through official channels. This often implies communication from one government to another.
Aid is typically offered through established international organizations or directly between governments. The initiative undertaken by President Macron to alleviate the controversy surrounding the acceptance of French aid, a topic instrumentalized by French official media outlets, is perceived as a direct address to the Moroccan people. Regrettably, this approach, which circumvents official channels, constitutes a deviation from established diplomatic protocol.
The unseen aspect of French media’s reporting on the Moroccan earthquake
In most instances, the onus of soliciting international aid in the aftermath of disasters, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, or volcanic eruptions, rests with the state that has been affected. This responsibility is a fundamental aspect of a nation’s sovereignty and its capacity to respond to crises within its borders.
This is a matter of national sovereignty. It is not customary for international relief to rush into a disaster-stricken country unless that country’s capacity to cope has been overwhelmed, as was the case with Haiti in 2010 following a devastating earthquake.
In the same sense, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Libyan House of Representatives issued an urgent appeal on the 11th of September calling for international help in dealing with the devastating impact of Storm Daniel on the Cyrenaica region. This appeal is a clear indication that the country’s capacity to cope with the disaster has been overwhelmed, much like Haiti in 2010 following a catastrophic earthquake.
In the wake of the recent earthquake in Morocco, international assistance has been offered by various nations, including France, Germany, Italy, and the United States. However, according to a statement from the Moroccan Interior Ministry, the country will initially only accept search and rescue teams from the United Kingdom, Qatar, Spain, and the United Arab Emirates.
This approach ensures that the aid received is targeted and effective, rather than overwhelming and potentially wasteful. In response to the earthquake, Morocco has activated an impressive display of national solidarity, gathering necessary materials and provisions for the affected population.
Read Also: Morocco Earthquake: France Has Crossed the Threshold of Tolerability
These efforts demonstrate a strong national resilience and commitment to recovery. Media narratives, particularly those from French media, suggesting otherwise can divert attention from Morocco’s significant disaster response efforts.
It is crucial to note that no Moroccan official has stated that the country refuses aid from any other nation.
Instead, Morocco has expressed gratitude for international support and indicated that aid will accept based on the population’s needs. Despite this, many official French media outlets have sparked controversy by suggesting that Morocco is withholding aid and endangering lives.
This narrative is not only false and unethical but could potentially hinder ongoing relief efforts. The French media’s speculation about Morocco’s acceptance of French aid has led to rumors and unproductive discourse.
The assertion that Morocco is missing an opportunity to save lives by declining French aid – a decision that has never been officially made – is misleading. The media’s portrayal of Morocco as depriving its people of much-needed support by refusing French aid is also inaccurate.
Several headlines have drawn attention to this unexpected development, leading to debate and speculation that Morocco has rejected France’s offer of assistance. These headlines convey a sense of bewilderment regarding Morocco’s decision and an expectation that France, due to its historical ties with Morocco, would be involved in relief efforts by default.
Morocco’s response to French aid has been a priming topic on French television networks. Numerous talk shows, which appear to be politically oriented, have provided insight into this issue.
However, these shows have focused more on the aspect of “not responding to aid” rather than discussing the humanitarian crisis and post-crisis relief.
These programs frequently feature experts and commentators who scrutinize Morocco’s disaster response and its handling of international aid, particularly from France. The extensive television talk shows amplified criticism and have kept the issue in the public consciousness, thereby increasing pressure on Morocco to act immediately when aid is offered.
Here are a few of the French television debates that discussed Morocco’s responses to French aid. The first debate titled “Earthquake: aid is organized… without France” discussed the organization of aid in the absence of France’s involvement.
The second and third debates, “Earthquake in Morocco: why is France’s aid not accepted?” and “Earthquake: Why does Morocco refuse France’s aid?” explored the reasons behind Morocco’s refusal of French aid. The fourth debate, “No request for aid from Morocco to France: a false controversy?” questioned whether the lack of a request for aid from Morocco to France was a false controversy.
Read Also: ‘Only the King Can Address His People’: Moroccans Tell Off Macron
The fifth debate, “Earthquake in Morocco: French rescuers waiting for the green light from Rabat to go on site” focused on French rescuers awaiting permission from Rabat to proceed to the site. The sixth debate, “Earthquake in Morocco: ‘The Moroccan government is blocking all rescue teams,’ says the founder of Rescuers without Borders” featured a statement from the founder of Rescuers without Borders claiming that the Moroccan government was blocking all rescue teams.
The final debate, “Earthquake in Morocco: When the French newspaper ‘Libération’ surfs on the pain of Moroccans” criticized the French newspaper ‘Libération’ for exploiting the suffering of Moroccans.
The French television debates concerning Morocco’s response to French aid in the aftermath of the earthquake carry several implications. The organization of aid without France’s involvement, as inferred from the titles, could potentially strain and impact the rescue efforts initiated by the Moroccan government.
Furthermore, the notion of a false controversy over Morocco’s lack of aid request from France, as reported in television talk shows, is perceived as a campaign against the country aimed at distorting the image of the state by suggesting that bureaucratic hurdles in Morocco are slowing down rescue operations. The French media’s claim that the “Moroccan government is blocking French rescue teams,” as mentioned in one of the headlines, is seen as blatant interference in Morocco’s policy for rescuing and relieving the devastated region. This is interpreted more as a disruption rather than a friendly offer of help.
Television shows and programs are not the only media outlets showing interest in humanitarian aid; print media have adopted a similar rhetoric. For instance, on September 11, the French newspaper Libération featured a headline accompanied by a poignant image of a Moroccan woman in profile, her eyes closed and mouth open, seemingly pleading for assistance amidst a catastrophic situation. The background of the photo depicts a destroyed house with ochre walls, reflecting the devastation caused by the recent deadly earthquake in Morocco.
Image: Maroc: “Aidez-nous, nous mourrons en silence” / Cahier Spécial. Retrieved from: https://boutique.liberation.fr/
Read Also: Earthquake: Samira Sitail Rebuts French Media’s Claims on Morocco Rejecting Aid
The caption “Help we die in silence” was used to describe the linguistic constructions accompanying the image in ‘Libération’, along with a subtitle that reads, “While the death toll from the earthquake rises, report from a region that has been devastated and where aid from abroad is having difficulty getting there.”
The newspaper’s use of an image depicting a victim in extreme distress during a national crisis raises questions about journalistic ethics. ‘Libération’ implies that while there is a desire to assist the Moroccan people, the Moroccan government is obstructing the delivery of this aid.
This logically undermines the ability of the Moroccan state to independently confront the disaster without France’s assistance. Even more concerning, this portrayal could potentially be interpreted as an open call for protests among Moroccans.
The criticism of ‘Libération’ for exploiting Moroccan suffering, as highlighted on the newspaper’s front page, underscores the role of media in shaping public perception and potentially influencing the government’s focus on rescue efforts. It is posited that the amalgamation of narrative and imagery serves dual purposes: it not only critiques Morocco’s response, but also underscores the undeniable strategy employed by French media to sway public opinion during such crises.
In this instance, the media appears to prioritize the visibility of French rescuers on the ground over the actual act of saving lives. This strategy, utilized by the French media, exerts pressure on Morocco to expedite the acceptance and facilitation of foreign aid.
The narrative disseminated by media outlets since the earthquake prompts reflection on the implications of sovereignty in the context of international crisis relief. It underscores the delicate equilibrium between a state’s autonomy and its duty to protect and assist its citizens. The complexities surrounding Morocco’s response to aid requests, as reported by French media outlets, have wide-ranging implications.
Firstly, if the media portrays Morocco’s response as slow or inadequate, it could potentially jeopardize ongoing rescue efforts. Rescue operations in the aftermath of such a catastrophe are complex and require meticulous planning. Negative media coverage could demotivate and reduce the productivity of teams on the ground.
Secondly, the media campaign could misrepresent Morocco’s crisis management plan. It’s crucial to remember that managing a disaster of this magnitude involves more than just accepting foreign aid. It necessitates a comprehensive strategy that includes crisis response, long-term recovery programs, infrastructure rebuilding, and trauma care.
By concentrating predominantly on the delay in accepting French aid, while neglecting the broader efforts of Morocco, the media risks reducing the complexity of the situation to a mere oversimplification. It is essential to consider the multifaceted nature of disaster response, which encompasses more than just international aid acceptance.
In conclusion, we strongly believe that the French media’s reporting may be hindering disaster management and distorting the country’s effort to handle the crisis within international standards by alleging that Morocco has been slow to accept the French aid.
It is recommended that French media coverage be accurate and respectful of Morocco’s decisions and actions, as these are crucial components of any disaster response and action.
Inaccurate narratives can potentially cause unnecessary controversy and hinder relief efforts, rather than aiding them. It is important for the French media to understand that Morocco aims to mobilize international assistance in a manner that best serves its people and advances its strategic interests.
This involves emphasizing targeted aid and upholding national sovereignty. By doing so, Morocco not only clarifies any confusion surrounding its response but also sets a precedent for responsible and effective disaster management globally. Morocco’s careful balance between accepting aid and maintaining sovereignty reflects both its commitment to its people and the challenges inherent in implementing an efficient global disaster response.
