Join on WhatsApp
Join on Telegram
Rabat – The decision to return to Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) has set off a wide public reaction across Morocco, where relief, skepticism, and political interpretation now coexist in the same conversation.
Head of Government Aziz Akhannouch confirmed today that Morocco will abandon GMT+1 at the end of summer, a policy that has shaped daily life for years. He presented the move as a response to citizens’ demands, after what he described as a careful review of the system’s effects.
For many, the announcement feels less like a policy shift and more like the end of a long period of tension between daily routines and imposed time.
A long-awaited shift
On social media, the first wave of reactions carries a clear tone of relief. Comments spread quickly. “We’ve been waiting a lifetime for this historic move,” one user wrote.
“Took them long enough,” another added.
Across platforms, similar expressions appear again and again. “Finally.” “Good news.” “At last.” These short reactions reflect years of accumulated frustration rather than simple approval of a single decision.
The intensity of these responses does not come as a surprise. For years, Moroccans have returned to the same debate, especially with each seasonal clock change. Online petitions have resurfaced time after time, each one echoing the same demand: return to GMT.
The most recent petition gathered more than 340,000 signatures. Its message described GMT+1 as more than an inconvenience. “The adoption of daylight saving time in Morocco represents a daily challenge for citizens,” the text reads. “For many of us, the sudden shift in time leads to ongoing disruptions to our biological clocks.”
Daily life under pressure
This debate is even bigger than the public sentiment. Several studies have attempted to measure the impact of GMT+1 on daily life. A report published in February by the African Center for Strategic and Digital Studies pointed to concrete effects: shorter sleep, dark morning commutes, and difficulty maintaining concentration, especially in schools.
Students stand at the center of this issue. Their natural sleep rhythms tend to shift later, which creates a gap between biological needs and imposed schedules. The result often appears in classrooms, where fatigue, lateness, and reduced academic performance become common.
These concerns have existed for years. When the government adopted Decree 2.18.855 in 2018 and extended GMT+1 throughout the year, the reaction went beyond online debate. Students organized protests, skipped classes, and took to the streets in several cities. Their demands focused on the time system and the structure of the school day.
Despite this opposition, authorities maintained that GMT+1 served broader economic goals. Officials argued that the time shift reduced energy consumption and facilitated coordination with European partners.
Between relief and suspicion
While many welcome the recent decision, another current runs beneath the surface. Some voices question not the measure itself, but the moment in which it arrives.
“As elections approach, even the hands of the clock change direction,” one social media user wrote, suggesting that political calendars now influence even the movement of time.
Another comment adopts a more direct tone: “When the right decision comes from the wrong person.”
These reactions point to a wider mistrust toward political actors. The legislative elections scheduled for September 23 form an unavoidable backdrop to the announcement. In this context, even widely supported decisions can take on a different meaning.
For some observers, the move may help restore a degree of public confidence. Others see it as a calculated response to growing dissatisfaction, especially after years of refusal to revise the policy.
A decision that reopens debate
The return to GMT does not close the conversation, but shifts its focus.
For years, the government defended GMT+1 as an economic necessity. The current decision suggests a change in priorities, or at least an acknowledgment that social costs have weighed heavily on public life.
At the same time, the debate now extends beyond the clock itself to raise broader questions about how public pressure shapes policy, and when authorities choose to respond.
For many Moroccans, however, the immediate reality matters more than the interpretation. The prospect of brighter mornings, more natural sleep patterns, and a schedule closer to daily rhythms brings a sense of relief that no political reading can fully erase.
After years of petitions, protests, and repeated calls for change, the return to GMT stands as a rare moment where public demand translates into tangible action, whatever the reasons behind it.
