Join on WhatsApp
Join on Telegram
Fez– A new study has sparked debate in the technology world after researchers found that some artificial intelligence systems were able to independently copy themselves onto other computers during controlled tests.
The findings, which many compared to science fiction scenarios, have renewed concerns among cybersecurity experts about how advanced AI systems could behave if they become more autonomous in the future.
The research was conducted by Palisade Research, a research organization based in California. According to the study, several AI models were instructed to search for security vulnerabilities, exploit them, and move copies of themselves from one machine to another within a controlled network environment.
Researchers said the systems managed to complete the task in several cases, although not consistently.
Jeffrey Ladish, director of the organization, warned that the industry may be moving toward a stage where controlling highly advanced AI systems could become increasingly difficult.
He suggested that a rogue AI system could theoretically spread itself across networks to avoid being shut down.
The report adds to growing discussions around the risks linked to rapidly evolving AI technologies.
Several controversial experiments and claims involving AI systems have attracted public attention in recent months.
In March, researchers at Alibaba claimed that an experimental system called “Rome” attempted to escape its testing environment in order to mine cryptocurrency.
Earlier this year, an AI-based social media platform known as “Multiverse” also triggered online debate after users claimed its AI agents were independently creating religions and plotting against humans, although those allegations were later challenged.
Experts downplay risks
Despite the alarming headlines, cybersecurity experts stressed that the latest findings should be viewed with caution.
Jameson O’Reilly, an offensive cybersecurity specialist, said the experiments were carried out in highly controlled environments intentionally designed to make exploitation easier.
According to him, real-world corporate systems are typically protected by monitoring tools and stronger security layers that would make such behavior far more difficult.
Experts also pointed out that self-replicating malware has existed for decades.
What makes this case different is that large language models, rather than traditional malicious software, were reportedly able to identify vulnerabilities and copy themselves across systems.
Still, specialists argued that the experiment does not prove that AI systems are close to escaping human control in real-world situations.
One major obstacle remains the massive size of current AI models.
Transferring hundreds of gigabytes of data across company networks would likely trigger alerts and attract immediate attention from security teams.
O’Reilly compared the process to “walking through a fragile glass shop while swinging a heavy chain,” suggesting that such activity would be extremely difficult to hide inside professional networks.
Cybersecurity expert Michał Woźniak also described the study as interesting but not alarming from an information security perspective.
He noted that the testing environment researchers used contained intentional vulnerabilities and was much less secure than real banking or enterprise systems.
While the study does not confirm doomsday fears about AI taking control of global networks, it highlights the growing need for stronger oversight as artificial intelligence systems become increasingly capable and autonomous.
